Imperial Rivalries vs Multipolar World: Is Global Power Shifting Backward? | UPSC Perspective

Q.Examine the issues associated with commercial speech in India. Analyse the Supreme Court’s jurisprudence on the matter, and suggest a regulatory framework that balances consumer protection with freedom of expression.

Ans.Commercial speech, broadly including advertisements, endorsements, and promotions, is recognised under Article 19(1)(a) but subject to reasonable restrictions under Article 19(2). In the digital era, with influencer marketing and viral campaigns, the scope and regulation of such speech has become contentious.

Issues Associated with Commercial Speech in India

1. Proliferation of Misleading and False Advertising: The most significant issue is the prevalence of advertisements that make unsubstantiated claims, especially in sectors like healthcare (patent medicines), cosmetics, food and beverages, and the burgeoning EdTech and FinTech industries. Claims like “guaranteed cure,” “instant results,” or “no side effects” are common.
   • Example: ASCI flagged Patanjali’s COVID cure ads (2020)
2. Public health & morality: Advertising of tobacco/alcohol through surrogate branding remains a loophole.
   • Example: liquor brands under music/soda labels.
3. Consumer exploitation through influencers: Paid promotions on Instagram/YouTube often lack disclosure. 
   • The rise of social media influencers, targeted ads, and native advertising has blurred the lines between organic content and paid promotion. Disclosure requirements are often flouted, and monitoring this vast digital space is a monumental task.
4. Consumer Vulnerability: A large section of the Indian consumer base is not fully literate or aware of their rights, making them easy targets for deceptive practices. Advertisements often exploit cultural beliefs, superstitions, and a lack of scientific temper.
5. Unequal access to discourse: Corporates with large ad budgets dominate narratives, marginalising citizen/grassroots voices.
6. Dignity and decency concerns: Certain comedy and influencer content trivialises vulnerable groups. Example: stand-up comedians’ derogatory remarks on SMA(Spinal Muscular Atrophy) patients (case before SC, 2025).
7. Regulatory vacuum in digital space: Existing laws inadequately cover influencer marketing and cross-border digital ads.
8. Regulatory Overlap and Fragmentation: There is no single regulator for advertising. Multiple laws and bodies govern different aspects, leading to confusion and inefficiency:
   • The Consumer Protection Act, 2019: Prohibits unfair trade practices and misleading ads. Establishes a Central Consumer Protection Authority (CCPA) to take pre-emptive action.
   • Cable Television Networks (Regulation) Act, 1995 & Rules: Provides a programming and advertising code that broadcasters must follow.
   • Advertising Standards Council of India (ASCI): A self-regulatory voluntary body whose code is backed by the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting. While effective, its rulings are not legally binding.
   • Sector-Specific Regulators: Bodies like the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) for financial ads, the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) for food products, and the Drug Controller General of India (DCGI) for pharmaceuticals have their own advertising guidelines.
9. Enforcement Challenges: Despite laws, enforcement is weak and slow. Penalties have historically been insufficient to act as a deterrent for large corporations. The process of filing a complaint and getting redressal is often cumbersome for the average consumer.

Supreme Court’s Jurisprudence

• In Hamdard Dawakhana v. Union of India (1959), the Court held that advertisements tied to trade and commerce do not qualify as free speech.
• However, in Tata Press v. MTNL (1995), the Court recognised commercial speech as constitutionally protected, since advertisements serve public interest by disseminating information.
• Later judgments, such as A. Suresh v. State of Tamil Nadu (1997), reiterated the need to balance commercial expression with societal interests
• SC Order (2025): The Supreme Court, hearing a petition filed by M/s SMA Cure Foundation, cautioned social media influencers and podcasters that they cannot press their free speech rights when their “commercial” content offends the dignity and sensitivities of others, underlining that humour or entertainment premised on ridicule of vulnerable groups will not be permitted.

Regulatory Framework – Way Forward

1. Comprehensive Guidelines
   • Union Government to prepare guidelines in consultation with stakeholders as directed by the Supreme Court
   • Key bodies to be involved:
     • NBDA (News Broadcasters & Digital Association) → industry self-regulation on digital/TV content.
     • ASCI (Advertising Standards Council of India) → monitors false, misleading, or offensive advertisements.
     • Digital platforms & intermediaries (e.g., Meta, Google, YouTube) → to ensure compliance with Indian laws.
     • Civil society organisations → for safeguarding dignity and protecting vulnerable groups.
   • Such a consultative approach ensures both freedom of expression and consumer protection.
2. Mandatory Disclosure Norms for Influencers
   • The CCPA (Central Consumer Protection Authority) issued guidelines in 2022 requiring influencers to clearly disclose paid partnerships, sponsorships, or gifts in their content.
   • These rules must be strictly enforced across Instagram, YouTube, and emerging platforms.
   • Penalties for non-compliance should be made more stringent and deterrent, especially in areas like crypto promotions, health products, and financial advice.
   • Strict Liability for Endorsers and Influencers:
     • The principle of “due diligence” must be enforced strictly. Celebrities and influencers should be legally obligated to verify the claims of the products they endorse.
     • Penalties for endorsers who knowingly or negligently promote misleading products should be significant to discourage irresponsible endorsements.
3. Strengthening the Consumer Protection Act, 2019
   • The Act already prohibits misleading and unfair trade practices in advertising.
   • Way forward:
     • Impose higher financial penalties on repeat offenders.
     • Empower consumer courts to order compulsory corrections and public apologies.
     • Create a fast-track mechanism for complaints related to digital advertisements.
4. Updating IT Rules for the Digital Age
   • The IT (Intermediary Guidelines & Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021 under the Information Technology Act, 2000 regulate digital content.
   • They must be updated to:
     • Create a classification system distinguishing truthful informative ads (protected) from harmful/misleading ads (restricted).
     • Impose due diligence obligations on digital intermediaries to flag and remove harmful advertisements swiftly.
5. Consumer-centric regulation: Establish rigorous standards for truthfulness and transparency in advertising, prioritizing consumer welfare and penalizing deceptive practices.
6. Independent oversight: Empower regulatory bodies like the Advertising Standards Council of India (ASCI) with real enforcement authority, including penalties and mandatory corrections for violations
7. Graduated Regulation Approach
   • Instead of blanket bans, adopt a tiered framework:
     • Truthful, informative, and public-interest ads → fully protected under Article 19(1)(a).
     • Potentially harmful or misleading ads (health, finance, education) → subject to stricter scrutiny.
     • Deceptive, immoral, or exploitative ads → outright prohibition under Article 19(2) (grounds like public order, morality, consumer protection).
   • This ensures a balance between free speech rights and societal interests
8. Periodic review: Regularly reassess the regulatory restrictions—especially those affecting new and evolving types of commercial speech in digital media—to ensure that the rules are responsive to technological and market developments while remaining consistent with constitutional protections of free expression
9. Proactive Monitoring and Technology Integration:
   • The CCPA and ASCI must develop advanced tech tools for monitoring digital advertisements, including AI-based systems to scan social media for potential violations, especially by influencers.
10. Consumer Empowerment and Education:
    • Launch large-scale awareness campaigns to educate consumers about their rights and how to identify misleading advertisements.
    • Establish simple, user-friendly grievance portals and helplines for reporting suspect ads.

Conclusion
India’s jurisprudence affirms that while commercial speech is a facet of free expression, it cannot override consumer rights, public health, or dignity. A robust regulatory framework, aligned with constitutional freedoms, will help navigate the challenges of digital commercialisation of speech.